Weekly Briefing

article sponsor image
Partner Content

Managing Building Automation and Integration Like an Investment Portfolio

May 22, 2025 | Marc Petock, VP, Chief Marketing & Communications Officer, Lynxspring
5 min read
listen to article Listen to this article

What if your building automation and integration decisions were managed with the same precision, discipline, and long-term vision as Warren Buffett’s investment portfolio?

The challenge is that most companies don’t look at building automation this way. They approach it as a necessary expense, focusing on immediate operational needs, short-term projects, and the latest shiny platforms, without a cohesive strategy. This mindset turns automation into an endless series of costs, instead of what it truly can be: a powerful investment designed to compound operational and business value.


To change this narrative, we need to reframe how we think about building automation. What if we managed it like Berkshire Hathaway manages its investments? What would it take to build an open, automation and integration building portfolio that not only supports business operations but drives them forward with the same clarity, confidence, and long-term payoff as Buffett’s legendary stock picks? Let’s break it down.


The core philosophy: Building automation is an investment, not an expense

At the heart of Buffett’s success is a simple philosophy: focus on intrinsic value, invest with a long-term horizon, and avoid unnecessary risks. This approach isn’t just for Wall Street; it’s equally powerful in the world of building automation, integration and smarter buildings.


But that’s like building a financial portfolio by simply buying the cheapest stocks available. It’s reactive, restricted, and often expensive overall due to inefficiencies, integration challenges and missed opportunities.


Now flip that approach. Imagine treating every automation and integration decision as if it were an investment with the potential to either compound value or drain resources over time. Instead of asking, “How much does this cost?” start asking, “What’s the long-term return on this investment?” This shift in thinking creates discipline, clarity, and purpose. It forces leaders to evaluate automation not just for its features or price tag, but for its strategic fitness, scalability, and impact on operational and business goals.


Applying Buffett’s principles to building automation

Start by asking:

  • Do you have a clear, strategic rationale behind your major automation investments?
  • Are your decisions driven by long-term value, not just short-term fixes?
  • Is your automation portfolio resilient, adaptable, and aligned with your business goals and the desired outcomes you are looking to deliver?
  • Are you actively managing risks – or just hoping things will not go wrong?

Warren Buffett’s investment principles are not complicated, but their simplicity hides profound wisdom. When applied to automation, they create a framework for making smarter, more strategic decisions.

  1. Value over price – Buffett famously said, “Price is what you pay; value is what you get.” In building automation, it’s easy to chase the cheapest solution or the flashiest new platform. But the real question is: what value will this technology deliver over time? A higher upfront cost might yield greater long-term efficiency, scalability, and security – delivering a better return than a less expensive alternative that becomes obsolete or requires constant workarounds.
  2. Circle of competence – Buffett only invests in businesses he understands deeply. Similarly, companies need to make automation decisions within their “circle of competence.” This doesn’t mean avoiding innovation, but it does mean ensuring that decisions are informed by a clear understanding of how technology fits into the broader operational and business strategy. Too often, organizations invest in platforms they do not fully understand, leading to poor adoption, misalignment, wasted resources and the lack of delivering outcomes.
  3. Margin of safety – Buffett always looks for a margin of safety – an investment buffer that protects against unforeseen risks. In automation, this translates to resilience. Are your systems designed with redundancy? Is your cybersecurity posture strong enough to withstand unexpected threats? Do you have backup strategies for critical operations? A well-managed automation portfolio isn’t just about efficiency; it’s about durability in the face of uncertainty.
  4. Long-term thinking – Perhaps Buffett’s most defining characteristic is his patience. He invests for the long haul, ignoring short-term market noise. In building automation, this means resisting the temptation of quick fixes that don’t align with the company’s strategic goals. It’s easy to get excited about the latest platform, but does it support where the business wants to be in five or ten years? Sustainable growth comes from technologies that integrate, scale, and adapt over time – not from chasing every trend.

So, what does it take to apply this type of approach?

  • Clarity in decision-making is key. Just as Buffett has an investment thesis for every stock he buys, building automation leaders should have a clear rationale for every major technology decision. What problem does it solve? How does it align with business goals? What outcomes do I want to achieve? What’s the expected return on investment – not just financially, but in terms of operational efficiency, sustainability, and scalability?
  • Patience and discipline are equally important. In the fast-paced world of building technology, it’s easy to feel pressured to act quickly. But speed without strategy leads to mistakes. The best automation leaders know when to move fast and when to pause, assess and make deliberate choices.
  • Data-driven judgments separate great practitioners from average ones. Buffett doesn’t invest based on hype; he relies on data, analysis, and rigorous evaluation. In automation, this means leveraging performance metrics, energy usage trends, cost efficiency and business impact to guide decisions.
  • Decisive allocation is crucial. Not every technology deserves equal attention or investment. Great building automation leaders know where to double down – investing heavily in platforms that drive efficiency and adaptability – and where to cut losses on underperforming systems. Just like managing a financial portfolio, the goal is to maximize returns while minimizing waste.

Ultimately, the goal is to deploy smart, open automation systems that are as robust and adaptable as a well-diversified investment portfolio. It is about being the most disciplined, strategic, and focused on long-term outcomes. Because in the end, great automation systems aren’t just about the technology, they are about delivering specific outcomes and creating lasting business value.


Marc Petock, VP, Chief Marketing & Communications Officer, Lynxspring
Marc Petock is a pioneer in leading the Intelligent/Smart Buildings and M2M movements pushing the industry forward and has contributed to transforming and changing the Intelligent Buildings and M2M (now IoT) industries. As Chief Marketing and Communications Officer for Lynxspring, Marc leads corporate and product marketing, strategy, brand management, public relations and communications that support the company’s strategic and growth initiatives.

This Week’s Sponsor

Lynxspring is an innovative industry leader with decades of expertise in building automation, energy management and integrated control systems. We develop, manufacture, distribute, and support edge-to-enterprise solutions and open, scalable, interoperable platforms, customized applications, and data analytics. With nearly 450+ partners and 50,000 devices deployed in millions of square feet of commercial settings in the US and globally, our JENEsys Edge portfolio of programmable controllers are also perfect for facility, equipment, unitary, plant and VAV control. Lynxspring provides smart and economical solutions for building owners/operators, equipment manufacturers and system integrators.