Why scenario analysis for CRE modeling needs new infrastructure
Mark Fitzgerald, Senior Director, Product Management, Altus Group
Volatile markets demand more scenario analysis, but fragmented tools and manual processes are keeping most CRE teams from scaling up.
Most teams know scenario analysis matters, but few have the infrastructure to do it well
For much of the last decade, commercial real estate (CRE) investment teams could afford to anchor decisions to a single base-case scenario. Compressing cap rates, predictable rent growth, historically low interest rates, and liquid capital markets meant the range of plausible outcomes for a given asset was relatively narrow. The base case wasn’t just a starting point, for many, it was the entire analysis.
"For many, prior to the pandemic, scenario analysis was often a perfunctory exercise. Informative, though limited, sensitivity tables of cap rates and other key assumptions generally were enough to satisfy investment committees and allocation decisions,” recalls Omar Eltorai, Senior Director of Research at Altus Group.
That era is over. The post-pandemic market has introduced a fundamentally different risk landscape:
- Interest rates moved faster than most models had stress-tested
- Leasing behavior shifted structurally in key sectors
- Operating costs spiked in ways that annual escalators never anticipated
- Capital markets became decidedly more selective
What emerged was not a temporary correction but a sustained widening of the gap between a base case and a realistic downside.
“The distribution of potential outcomes has widened considerably,” adds Eltorai. “This isn’t just cyclical volatility; it’s the result of concurrent structural shifts and macroeconomic shocks that have fundamentally altered refinancing prospects and exit assumptions. An overreliance on a single base-case scenario is more risky than ever.”
Making investment decisions without rigorous stress-testing now carries significantly more risk than it did, even five years ago. Portfolio teams already know this; scenario analysis is widely recognized as a fundamental part of sound investment management. The bottleneck isn’t awareness, it’s infrastructure.
How portfolio teams run scenario analysis today
For most CRE investment firms, the scenario analysis workflow follows a well-worn but deeply inefficient path. Teams build property-level models in valuation software such as ARGUS Enterprise, export results into spreadsheets, manipulate assumptions manually, and then consolidate outputs across assets to get a portfolio-level view. Some supplement this with general-purpose business intelligence tools for visualization, while larger institutions may rely on proprietary internal builds, but these remain out of reach for the majority of teams.
"The complexity of traditional valuation software means senior asset and portfolio managers typically aren't the ones running the analysis, the analysts are,” explains Mark Fitzgerald, Senior Director of Product Management at Altus Group. “That creates a disconnect between the person who has the knowledge and the person running the numbers, and it adds time at every step."
The result is a process that goes deep at the property level or broad at the reporting level, but rarely connects the two.
Where the process breaks down
That disconnect – between who holds the knowledge and who runs the numbers – doesn't just slow teams down. It creates a cascade of compounding pain points across the organization, including:
- Manual effort and disjointed tools: Scenario building in manual spreadsheets means model duplication, manual version management, and fragile formulas that are slow to build and impossible to scale across a portfolio.
- Slow decision-making: Multi-day turnaround times to build, consolidate, and communicate scenario results delay the go/no-go and price-adjustment decisions that often matter most in the moments when the market is moving.
- Unreliable and incomparable outcomes: When different analysts stress-test without a unified library of assumptions and methodologies, portfolio-level aggregation can end up being built on misaligned inputs.
- Unclear risk exposure: Without side-by-side scenario comparisons and data-driven performance attribution, teams know broadly that they have exposure, but they can’t quickly pinpoint which specific assets and assumptions are driving the most impact.
- Limited collaboration: When scenario work lives in individual spreadsheets and siloed models, assumptions go unchallenged, strategy misalignment persists, and teams redo work that has already been done elsewhere in the organization.
The most forward-thinking portfolio teams are not simply trying to run more scenarios faster. They are rethinking the infrastructure around scenario analysis entirely. That starts with running scenarios within the same environment as valuations thus eliminating model duplication and version sprawl at the source. It means making performance attribution a standard output, where every scenario comparison surfaces what's driving the differences, not just what the outcome is. And it means treating scenarios as shared, living artifacts that are stored centrally, accessible across the team, and iterated on over time.
This shift reflects a broader recognition: even the most skilled teams are constrained by infrastructure that can't move at the speed, consistency, or scale their decisions demand.
Built for the way portfolio teams actually work
Figure 1: Side-by-side scenario comparison in ARGUS Intelligence

The practices outlined above represent where the most forward-thinking portfolio teams are headed. What has historically made them difficult to achieve consistently isn't intent, it's infrastructure. The scenario analysis capabilities within ARGUS Intelligence were built to close that gap, making each of these practices operationally accessible versus just aspirational:
- Dynamic simulations within a single model
- Multi-variable scenario building
- Up to four side-by-side scenario comparisons with built-in performance attribution
- A shared, organization-approved assumption library
- A centralized scenario workspace
Closing the infrastructure gap
For CRE portfolio teams today, volatility isn't a phase the market is passing through, it's the environment they're permanently operating in, and scenario analysis is how leading firms manage within it. The firms pulling ahead are the ones investing in infrastructure: the tools, the processes, and the shared analytical environment required to turn scenario analysis from a periodic exercise into a continuous strategic capability.
That shift starts with having the right foundation. As Fitzgerald puts it: "Scenario analysis allows portfolio managers to make buy/sell/hold decisions based on real numbers. When it's built on existing valuation models in ARGUS Intelligence, teams are leveraging work that's already been done; this improves their decision-making process and accurately quantifies decisions rather than acting on instinct."
This Week’s Sponsor
Altus Group is a leading provider of CRE intelligence, anchored by ARGUS – the industry’s go-to software for valuation and performance analytics. For more than two decades, Altus has played a vital role in empowering CRE professionals with the analytics and trusted advice they need to make high-stakes decisions with confidence. For more information, please visit www.altusgroup.com.
Read Next
5/13/2026
When Minutes Matter: Using FBI Winter SHIELD to Defend Your Business in an AI-Driven Threat Environment The cybersecurity clock starts when a weakness becomes visible to an attacker, not when the company realizes it has been breached.
5/13/2026
Rolling Out AI in Commercial Real Estate: The Five Pillars Something has shifted in the conversations I'm having with CRE technology leaders.
4/29/2026
The Opportunity Gap in Building Automation and Controls The building automation and controls (BAC) industry stands at a defining moment.
4/15/2026
How are CRE professionals reacting to market uncertainty? Commercial real estate feels uncertain these days.






